AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

JOSEPH MALINE AND SUSAN MALINE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CITY OF UTICA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND ADVANCED ABSORBER PRODUCTS, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendant Advanced Absorber Products, Inc. (AAP) to dismiss the complaint against it. AAP established that in 1982 it merged with defendant Keene Corporation (Keene). As a result of the merger, Keene became the owner of all real and personal property ( see, Business Corporation Law § 906 Bus. Corp.[b][2]) and assumed all its "liabilities, obligations and penalties" (Business Corporation Law § 906 Bus. Corp.[b][3]). Consequently, any cause of action that plaintiffs could assert against AAP must be asserted against Keene.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MALINE v. CITY OF UTICA
(Dec 30, 1999)