AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

JACK J. SCHWARTZ, APPELLANT v. CUSTOM PRINTING CO., RESPONDENT.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Jack J. Schwartz appeals from a judgment entered against him and in favor of Respondent Custom Printing Co. in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and record on appeal and conclude that an extended opinion would serve no precedential or jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion for their exclusive use detailing the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHWARTZ v. CUSTOM PRINTING CO
(Jan 4, 2000)