DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court correctly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. The hearing court's determination rested largely upon its assessment of the credibility of the testifying officer and is entitled to great deference (see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759 ). Since the hearing court's conclusion is amply supported by the credible evidence adduced at the suppression hearing, it will not be disturbed (see, People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86 ).
The trial court's plea allocution was sufficient to establish that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal from all aspects of the proceedings but the evidentiary suppression issue. Accordingly, we do not reach the defendant's remaining contentions (see, People v. Kemp, N Y 2d [Dec. 2, 1999]; People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 280 ; People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 11 ; People v. Robinson, 188 A.D.2d 622 ).
BRACKEN, J.P., THOMPSON, SULLIVAN, and KRAUSMAN, JJ., concur.