AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

ROBERT TADDEO, respondent, v. 15 WEST 72ND STREET OWNERS CORP., defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant, et al., defendant; JOYCE CONTRACTING CO., third-party defendant-respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, and the motion is granted conditionally in the event of the entry of a judgment awarding damages in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant third-party plaintiff.

The Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of the defendant third-party plaintiff 15 West 72nd Street Owners Corp. (hereinafter 15 West), for summary judgment on the third-party complaint for common-law indemnification against Joyce Contracting Co. (hereinafter Joyce). After 15 West made out a prima facie case that it was entitled to summary judgment because it did not direct or control the plaintiff's work, Joyce failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Rivera v. D'Allesandro, 248 A.D.2d 522; Lopez v. 36-2nd J Corp., 211 A.D.2d 667 ; Richardson v. Matarese, 206 A.D.2d 354 ). Although liability has not been determined in this case, the motion for summary judgment on the third-party complaint for common-law indemnification is not premature and may be granted conditionally (see, Clark v. 345 E. 52nd St. Owners, 245 A.D.2d 410 ;Rice v. PCM Dev. Agency Co., 230 A.D.2d 898 ).

BRACKEN, J.P., THOMPSON, SULLIVAN, and KRAUSMAN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TADDEO v. 15 WEST 72ND STREET OWNERS CORP
(Jan 18, 2000)