Civil Court's determination in the eviction proceeding that the landlord wrongfully evicted the Mayes plaintiffs collaterally estops the landlord from denying its liability to the Mayes plaintiffs in this action absent a showing that it did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of its wrongdoing in Civil Court (see, Hernandez v. Nelson, 143 A.D.2d 632). The landlord makes no such showing. Nor is the landlord's liability to the Mayes plaintiffs affected by its cross claims against its attorneys in the eviction proceeding and the City Marshal (see,Maracina v. Shirrmeister, 105 A.D.2d 672, 673). However, the IAS court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the Sanchez plaintiffs, since questions of fact remain as to whether they had a possessory interest in the apartment as would entitle them to a remedy for wrongful eviction under RPAPL 853 Real Prop. Acts..
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.