AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MDJR ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., appellants, v. FRANK LaTORRE, et al., defendants, SANDRA MARCHESIELLO, et al., defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents; KENNETH J. MOLLOY, third-party defendant-respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the cross motion is granted.

The plaintiffs made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating the existence of a promissory note executed by the defendants Sandra Marchesiello and Joseph P. Marchesiello, the unconditional terms of repayment, and the default by the Marchesiellos (see, Haselnuss v. Delta Testing Labs., 249 A.D.2d 509 ; Capital Circulation Corp. v. Gallop Leasing Corp., 248 A.D.2d 578 ). The assertions by the Marchesiellos, including a claimed lack of consideration and fraud, were merely unsupported conclusory allegations which were insufficient to defeat the cross motion (see, Capital Circulation Corp. v. Gallop Leasing Corp., supra, at 578, 579).

The Marchesiellos' remaining contentions are without merit.

O'BRIEN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, FLORIO, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MDJR ENTERPRISES, INC. v. LaTORRE
(Jan 24, 2000)