SHARP, W., J.
Ford appeals from his convictions and sentences for trafficking in over 28 grams of cocaine, without a weapon, possession of cocaine with intent to sell and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He was sentenced to 8 years in prison on each count, to run concurrently. We affirm in part, but reverse the possession conviction and sentence on double jeopardy grounds. U.S. Const. Amend. V; Fla. Const. Art. I, § 9. §§ 893.13(1)(a)(1), 893.03(2)(a)(4), Fla. Stat.
§§ 893.135(1)(b)(1)(a); 893.03(2)(a)(4); 775.087(1), Fla. Stat.
§ 790.23, Fla. Stat.
In this case, it was established that Ford was convicted of trafficking in cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to sell for the same amount of contraband, in a single episode. To convict him of both offenses violates Ford's double jeopardy rights. Johnson v. State, 712 So.2d 380 (Fla. 1998). Nor do we think Ford waived the double jeopardy issue in this case by his attorney's failure to object to instructions or move to dismiss the possession count.
Waiver of double jeopardy rights will not be implied from mere silence or a failure to object. Johnson v. State, 460 So.2d 954, 957 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), approved, 483 So.2d 420 (Fla. 1986).
It has been repeatedly held that double jeopardy rights are fundamental in nature and are not waived, absent a knowing waiver. See State v. Johnson, 483 So.2d 420, 422 (Fla. 1986); Rivera v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1825 (Fla. 4th DCA August 4, 1999); Austin v. State, 699 So.2d 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Waldon v. State, 670 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). As such it can be raised at any time, including for the first time on appeal. Id. In this case there was no affirmative or knowing waiver.
Accordingly, we affirm in all regards except for the conviction and sentence for possession, which we vacate.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.