Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was properly granted on the ground that defendants' prior attorney's affirmation in opposition to the motion contained only conclusory statements and unsubstantiated allegations that were patently insufficient to raise any issues of fact (see, Capelin Assocs. v. Globe Mfg. Corp., 34 N.Y.2d 338, 342-343). Defendants' subsequent motion to vacate the award of summary judgment on the ground that they were improperly served was properly denied, defendants having waived such defense when they failed to move on that ground within 60 days after serving their answer, and having failed to demonstrate undue hardship in urging incompetence of prior counsel as the reason for not having so moved (CPLR 3211[e]; cf., Abitol v. Schiff, 180 Misc.2d 949, 951).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.