AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 3 AND JANE DOE 4, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, v. COUNTY OF WAYNE, et al., Defendants, PARK WAY STUDIOS INTERNATIONAL, INC., AND GLAMOUR MAGIC, Defendants-Respondents-Appellants.

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum:

On August 18, 1995, Park Way Studios International, Inc. and its division, Glamour Magic (defendants), hired defendant Michael Hurd to conduct photo sessions at various locations. Plaintiffs allege that, during a photo session in Marion, New York, Hurd improperly touched them. The amended complaint alleges that defendants were negligent in hiring, retaining and supervising Hurd. Defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, and plaintiffs cross-moved for summary judgment on that cause of action. Supreme Court granted that part of defendants' motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the claim of negligent hiring and denied plaintiffs' cross motion.

The court erred in dismissing the claim of negligent hiring. Although defendants met their initial burden of establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, plaintiffs raised an issue of fact by submitting the deposition testimony of Hurd, in which he testified that defendants did not inquire about his prior criminal history ( see generally, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562). We thus modify the order accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JANE DOE 1 v. COUNTY OF WAYNE
(Feb 16, 2000)