AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CONRAD A. MARSHALL, Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a bench trial of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law § 155.35) and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (Penal Law § 165.50). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621), is legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt ( see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). The testimony of defendant that conflicted with that of the People's witnesses presented an issue of credibility for County Court, whose determination is entitled to great deference ( see, People v. Van Akin, 197 A.D.2d 845; People v. Davis, 191 A.D.2d 705, 706).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MARSHALL
(Feb 16, 2000)