AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

FELIX VAYNBERG, respondent, v. PROVIDENT OPERATING CORP., et al., appellants.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability is denied.

The Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Res ipsa loquitur is a rule of evidence, which merely provides a permissible inference of negligence, rather than a presumption (see, Dermatossian v. New York City Tr. Auth., 67 N.Y.2d 219, 226;Feuer v. HASC Summer Program, 247 A.D.2d 429; Davis v. Federated Dept. Stores, 227 A.D.2d 514). Thus, application of the doctrine as a basis for awarding summary judgment is inappropriate (see, Feuer v. HASC Summer Program, supra; Davis v. Federated Dept. Stores, supra; Shinshine Corp. v. Kinney Sys., 173 A.D.2d 293, 294; Veltri v. Stahl, 155 A.D.2d 287, 288).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VAYNBERG v. PROVIDENT OPERATING CORP
(Feb 17, 2000)