AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

222 BLOOMINGDALE ROAD ASSOCIATES, appellant, v. NYNEX PROPERTIES COMPANY, respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

This action, in which the plaintiff seeks, inter alia, to recover legal fees and disbursements incurred in bringing a prior action and defending against the defendant's counterclaims in that action, constitutes the splitting of a cause of action, which is prohibited (see, 930 Fifth Corp. v. King, 42 N.Y.2d 886 ; Wavertree Corp. v. 136 Waverly Assocs., 258 A.D.2d 392 ). In any event, the contractual indemnification provision upon which the instant action is premised does not encompass the plaintiff's claim for legal fees and disbursements. Where a contract is clear and unambiguous on its face, its plain meaning should govern its interpretation (see, Chimart Assoc. v. Paul, 66 N.Y.2d 570 ; Mallad Constr. Corp. v. County of Fed. Sav. Loan Assn., 32 N.Y.2d 285 ).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

222 BLOOMINGDALE ROAD v. NYNEX PROPERTIES
(Feb 24, 2000)