DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs' motion for leave to replead pursuant to CPLR 3211(e). The plaintiffs' motion was not made in connection with a motion by the defendants to dismiss the complaint, as the complaint had already been dismissed. Moreover, the plaintiffs did not submit the requisite proof for aCPLR 3211(e) motion (see, 527 Smith St. Brooklyn Corp. v. Bayside Fuel Oil Depot Corp., 262 A.D.2d 278 [2d Dept., June 1, 1999]), and, in any event, the proposed new complaint did not allege fraud pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law § 276 in sufficient detail (see, CPLR 3016 [b]; Menaker v. Alstaedter, 134 A.D.2d 412 ).