Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-PETITIONER, v. MICHAEL M. LONGCORE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

¶ 1. PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals should be affirmed or reversed. Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, and Justice DAVID T. PROSSER would affirm; Justice JON P. WILCOX, Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY, and Justice DIANE S. SYKES would reverse. Justice N. PATRICK CROOKS did not participate. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. LONGCORE
(Mar 10, 2000)