In opposition to the motion, plaintiff adduced evidence that shortly after she fell she spoke to defendant's store manager, who interviewed her, helped her fill out the Store Incident Report contained in the record that he signed as "Store Manager", acknowledged an awareness of the allegedly hazardous spill where she had fallen and stated that it was supposed to have been cleaned up. The statements by the former store manager, who had general supervision over the operation of the store, would be admissible on the issue of whether defendant had actual notice of the allegedly hazardous condition.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.