Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

GAIL STARKS v. STATE OF LOUISIANA, DOTD. ET AL

Granted. See per curiam.

CDT

PFC

WFM

HTL

BJJ

JPV

JTK

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

PER CURIAM[fn*] [fn*] Kimball, J., not on panel, recused. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

This application is granted.

The trial judge abused his discretion in granting a new trial because he wanted to judge the character and demeanor of live witnesses, rather than to decide the case on the record of the trial before his predecessor judge. The judgment of the trial court granting a new trial is reversed, and the motion for new trial is denied. The case is remanded to the court of appeal to review, on the record, the judgment of the trial court on original hearing.

The predecessor judge retired after rendering judgment. The present judge, after taking office, was called upon to rule on the timely motion for new trial.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STARKS v. STATE, 1999-3570 (La. 3/17/00)
(Mar 17, 2000)