AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. SANTIAGO RIVERA, appellant. (Ind. No. 15503/96)

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to provide the People with reasonable notice of his motion to dismiss the indictment (see, CPL 30.30 Crim. Proc.; CPL 210.45 Crim. Proc.[1]; People v. Lawrence, 64 N.Y.2d 200, 203; People v. Baxter, 216 A.D.2d 931; People v. Harvall, 196 A.D.2d 553, 554). In any event, we find that the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 Crim. Proc. (see, People v. Stirrup, 91 N.Y.2d 434; People v. Harris, 82 N.Y.2d 409).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

MANGANO, P.J., BRACKEN, LUCIANO, and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. RIVERA
(Mar 17, 2000)