DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that a statement made by the Supreme Court during voir dire unduly prejudiced him is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 Crim. Proc.[2]), and we decline to reach that issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
ALTMAN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, KRAUSMAN, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.