DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated October 16, 1998, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order dated July 28, 1998, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Where, as here, there is no indication that a change in custody will substantially enhance the child's welfare, and the custodial parent is not shown to be unfit or less fit to continue as the custodian, the custody arrangement in place should not be disturbed (see, Obey v. Degling, 37 N.Y.2d 768, 770 ; Muzzi v. Muzzi, 189 A.D.2d 1022 ). Contrary to the father's contention, he failed to provide any evidence that there was "a change in circumstances" warranting a hearing on the issue of custody (see, Matter of Ann C. v. Debra S., 221 A.D.2d 338 ; Lenczycki v. Alexander, 209 A.D.2d 480, 481 ). Further, disputes between former spouses over child custody and visitation are not subject to arbitration (see, Lipsius v. Lipsius, 250 A.D.2d 820 ; Cohen v. Cohen, 195 A.D.2d 586 ; Glauber v. Glauber, 192 A.D.2d 64,[ 192 A.D.2d 94]).
The father's remaining contentions are without merit.
RITTER, J.P., SANTUCCI, THOMPSON, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.