AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Herbert St. George, Plaintiff, v. W.J. Barney Corporation, et al., Defendants. [And Another Action] Kurtz Steel Corp., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent,

The plaintiff in the underlying personal injury action was an employee of one of the subcontractors at a construction site. He commenced that action against, among others, the general contractor at the site, W.J. Barney Corporation ("Barney"). Barney cross claimed, seeking defense and indemnification, and impleaded several other parties including Kurtz, another of the subcontractors. Kurtz commenced this third-party action seeking a declaration that the named defendants were obligated to defend and indemnify it in the underlying action: Crest Steel Co. ("Crest"), a subcontractor hired by Kurtz that was contractually obligated to have Kurtz named as an additional insured on its general liability insurance policy; Schaefer, Crest's insurance broker; and The Home Indemnity Co. ("Home"), Crest's general liability insurer to whose policy Kurtz was to be added. Shaefer issued a certificate of insurance naming Kurtz an additional insured on Crest's policy with Home, but the certificate contained one disclaimer that stated that it was issued for information only, that it did not confer any rights on the certificate holder and that it did not extend or amend the policy's coverage, and a second disclaimer that stated, among other things, that the insurance afforded by the policies listed on the certificate "is subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of such policies".

Under these circumstances, summary judgment should have been granted to Schaefer, the insurance broker. The certificate of insurance . . . is not a contract to insure . . . nor is it conclusive proof, standing alone, that such a contract exists [cites omitted]" (Buccini v. 1568 Broadway Assocs., 250 A.D.2d 466, 469). Moreover, while Schaefer may have arguably breached its duty to its client, Crest, it cannot be held liable to Kurtz, the additional insured, to whom it owed no duty (see, American Ref-Fuel Company of Hempstead v. Resource Recycling, 248 A.D.2d 420, 424).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ST. GEORGE v. W.J. BARNEY CORP
(Mar 28, 2000)