Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 220.09) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03). We reject the contention of defendant that he was convicted of an unindicted offense. Defendant was indicted and tried for the possession of all the cocaine found in the vehicle that he was driving ( cf., People v. McNab, 167 A.D.2d 858). To the extent that defendant contends that counts one and two of the indictment are duplicitous, that contention is not preserved for our review ( see, People v. Thomas [Robert E.], 267 A.D.2d 949 [decided Dec. 30, 1999]; People v. Rivera, 257 A.D.2d 425, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 901). In any event, each count "properly aggregated all the drugs simultaneously found in defendant's constructive possession" ( People v. Rivera, supra, at 426). We also reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court abused its discretion in summarily denying defendant's CPL 330.30 motion alleging juror misconduct ( see, People v. Rhodes, 92 A.D.2d 744).