Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
We reject the contention of defendant that prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of a fair trial. A defense witness testified that defendant never had possession of the weapon at issue and that the witness himself held the weapon the entire evening. During his closing argument, defense counsel noted that the witness was an admitted liar, but argued that he had nothing to gain by his testimony and would not risk perjuring himself by lying. In response, the prosecutor attempted to comment upon the law of perjury, but Supreme Court sustained defense counsel's objection. The prosecutor then stated that the witness was not at any risk of committing perjury. We conclude that, under the circumstances, the prosecutor's statement was a fair response to defense counsel's statements ( see, People v. Halm , 81 N.Y.2d 819, 821). In any event, the statement was not so egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial ( see, People v. Plant , 138 A.D.2d 968, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 1031 ; People v. Rubin ,101 A.D.2d 71, 77, lv denied 63 N.Y.2d 711 ).