AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

WENDY PELLEGRINO, et al., appellants, v. CHARLES A. SALZBERG, etc., et al., respondents.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

By order dated April 21, 1999, the Supreme Court sua sponte dismissed the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126(3) upon the plaintiffs' failure to comply with orders directing disclosure. In view of the plaintiffs' conduct, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs' motion to vacate that order (see, Cauley v. Long Is. R.R. Co., 234 A.D.2d 252 ;Watson v. Esposito, 231 A.D.2d 512 ; Kaplan v. Elkind, 208 A.D.2d 683 ).

O'BRIEN, J.P., RITTER, SULLIVAN, and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PELLEGRINO v. SALZBERG
(Mar 30, 2000)