Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. MABELEN SHAW, APPELLANT.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Mabelen Shaw, ("defendant"), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. Defendant seeks to reverse her convictions and sentences for voluntary manslaughter, section 565.023, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, for which defendant was sentenced to a total term of eighteen years in prison. We affirm.

All statutory references are to RSMo 1994, unless otherwise indicated.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts, and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. SHAW
(Apr 4, 2000)