AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., Plaintiffs,

SCHEDULING ORDER NO. 8

JACKSON, Judge

In accordance with the proceedings at the in-chambers scheduling conference of April 5, 2000, it is, this ___ day of April, 2000,

ORDERED, that the plaintiff United States shall file its preferred proposed form of permanent injunction, and the plaintiff states shall file any single proposed form of permanent injunction preferred by a majority of the plaintiff states if at variance with the version proposed by the United States, by April 25, 2000 if practicable, or, in any event, by April 28, 2000 at the latest; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that defendant Microsoft shall file its summary response to plaintiffs' proposal(s), including its objections to any or all proposed forms of permanent injunction, any counter-proposal(s) to the plaintiffs' submission(s), and its recommendations for future proceedings on the issue of remedy, by May 10, 2000; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that the plaintiff United States and the plaintiff states shall file any reply(s) to defendant Microsoft's response by May 17, 2000; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that all filings aforesaid shall be on the public record; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that a hearing on remedies is scheduled for May 24, 2000 at 10 a.m. in Courtroom No. 2.

Thomas Penfield Jackson U.S. District Judge

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, (D.D.C. 2000)
(Apr 4, 2000)