Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

KATHLEEN K. SHAULIS, Respondent v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE ETHICS COMMISSION, and the Commonwealth Bar Association, Inter

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

And Now, this 11th day of April, 2000, we hereby GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, LIMITED to the following issues:

Does the lower court's decision — which continues to exempt former public officials/employees who happen to be attorneys from the restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Act — conflict with controlling precedent set by this Court in P.J.S. v. State Ethics Comm'n, 555 Pa. 149, 723 A.2d 174 (1999), that attorneys may be regulated by the State Ethics Commission as part of a class which includes non-lawyers? Did the lower court exceed the bounds of appellate jurisdiction and act contrary to longstanding judicial precedent — including its own "on point" ruling — by entertaining this matter as an appeal from an advisory opinion?

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHAULIS v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE ETHICS COMM
(Apr 11, 2000)