The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. There was ample evidence from which defendant `s guilt could be reasonably inferred.
The prosecutor's summation comments on defendant's demeanor were relevant to defendant's credibility as a witness and did not deprive him of a fair trial. Defendant `s remaining claims of prosecutorial misconduct are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find no basis for reversal.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.