AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Starner Tree Ser v. ce Company, Incorporated, et al., respondents,

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To acquire title to real property by adverse possession, the possessor must establish that the character of the possession is "`hostile and under a claim of right, actual, open and notorious, exclusive and continuous' for the statutory period of 10 years" (Ray v. Beacon Hudson Mtn. Corp., 88 N.Y.2d 154, 159 , quoting Brand v. Prince, 35 N.Y.2d 634 ). Where lands are held by a municipality in its governmental capacity they may not be lost by adverse possession, but when held in its propriety capacity, there is no immunity against adverse possession (see, City of Tonawanda v. Ellicott Creek Homeowners Assn., 86 A.D.2d 118 ; Walsh's Inc. v. County of Oswego, 9 A.D.2d 393 ; Long Island Land Research Bureau, Inc. v. Town of Hempstead, 203 Misc. 619, aff'd 283 App. Div. 663, aff'd 308 N.Y. 818 ).

The Supreme Court properly found that the appellant held the subject property in its proprietary capacity and that there was a question of fact as to whether the plaintiffs have acquired title to the subject property by adverse possession (see generally, Ray v. Beacon Hudson Mtn. Corp., supra; Barnes v. Light, 116 N.Y. 34 ;Ramapo Mfg. Co. v. Mapes, 155 App. Div. 443 ).

The appellant's remaining contention is without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STARNER TREE SERVICE v. CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE
(Apr 24, 2000)