AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

RALPH A. IADAROLA et al., Appellants, v. MEADOWS PLAZA DEVELOPMENT CORP. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendants Meadows Plaza Development Corp. and Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Considering all of the facts and circumstances of the instant case, "including the width, depth, elevation, irregularity and appearance of the defect along with the "time, place and circumstance' of the injury", the Supreme Court correctly determined that the defect complained of by the plaintiffs was trivial as a matter of law ( Trincere v. County of Suffolk, 90 N.Y.2d 976, 978, quoting Caldwell v. Village of Is. Park, 304 N.Y. 268, 274; see, Riser v. New York City Hous. Auth., 260 A.D.2d 564; Marinaccio v. LeChambord Rest., 246 A.D.2d 514).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IADAROLA v. MEADOWS PLAZA DEVELOPMENT
(Apr 24, 2000)