DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff claims that her vehicle collided with the defendant's vehicle as she was beginning to make a left turn after she had stopped at a stop sign, looked both ways, and proceeded into the intersection of the two-way street. It is undisputed that the defendant had the right of way (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142 Veh. Traf.[a]), and the plaintiff admitted at her deposition that she saw the defendant before she began to turn.
The defendant made a prima facie showing that the accident resulted solely from the plaintiff's negligence (see, Cascio v. Scigiano, 262 A.D.2d 264; Smalley v. McCarthy, 254 A.D.2d 478; Singh v. Shafi, 252 A.D.2d 494; Bolta v. Lohan, 242 A.D.2d 356; Nunziata v. Birchell, 238 A.D.2d 555; Maxwell v. Land-Saunders, 233 A.D.2d 303). The plaintiff `s submission in opposition was insufficient to defeat the defendant's motion (see, Singh v. Shafi, supra; Bolta v. Lohan, supra; Maxwell v. Land-Saunders, supra). Thus, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the defendant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
O'BRIEN, J.P., THOMPSON, S. MILLER and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.