AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF DENISE PERALTA, petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER ARTUZ, ETC., respondent.

DECISION JUDGMENT

ADJUDGED that the petition is granted, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the determination is annulled, the charge is dismissed, and the respondent is directed to expunge all references to the charge and the proceedings from the petitioner's visitation record.

The regulations of the State of New York Department of Correctional Services provide that with respect to substances suspected of being contraband, "[e]ach person handling the suspected substance shall make an appropriate notation on the form to document the action taken as well as the chain of custody of the substance until it is identified or forwarded to the State Police laboratory" ( 7 NYCRR 1010.4[b]).

The chain-of-custody forms introduced into evidence at the hearing failed to account for the entire period of time from the recovery of the alleged contraband to its subsequent identification. It is well settled that "[w]here the Department of Correctional Services fails to comply with its own regulations in arriving at an administrative determination, that determination cannot stand" (Matter of Rollison v. Scully, 181 A.D.2d 734; see also, Matter of Garcia v. LeFevre, 64 N.Y.2d 1001, 1003; Matter of Estrella v. Coughlin, 131 A.D.2d 760). Consequently, the determination is annulled.

In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the petitioner's remaining contentions.

BRACKEN, J.P., THOMPSON, FRIEDMANN, and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF PERALTA v. ARTUZ
(May 3, 2000)