AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

William Bartley, et al., respondents, v. Accu-Glo Electric Corporation, et al., appellants.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and upon searching the record, summary judgment is granted to the defendants dismissing the cause of action to recover damages pursuant to Labor Law § 240(1).

While the injured plaintiff was standing on level ground, unloading a wire reel from the bed of a panel truck three feet from the ground, the reel caught on a lip of the bed of the truck and flew out, striking him. The instant action does not come within the scope of hazards covered by Labor Law § 240 (1) (see, Jacome v. State of New York, 266 A.D.2d 345 [2d Dept., Nov. 15, 1999]; cf., Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co., 78 N.Y.2d 509). Although the defendants never cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' Labor Law § 240(1) claim, this court has the authority pursuant to CPLR 3212(b) to search the record and award summary judgment to a nonmoving party (see, QDR Consultants Dev. Corp. v. Colonia Ins. Co., 251 A.D.2d 641; Dunham v. Hilco, 89 N.Y.2d 430).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FRIEDMANN, McGINITY and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARTLEY v. ACCU-GLO ELECTRIC CORPORATION
(May 8, 2000)