DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see, Matter of David H., 69 N.Y.2d 792), we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed the acts alleged in the petition. Furthermore, the Family Court's findings were not against the weight of the evidence. Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, Matter of Joan P., 245 A.D.2d 381). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, Matter of Isaac Q., 217 A.D.2d 410). The minor inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony did not render it incredible as a matter of law (see, Matter of Nikkia C., 187 A.D.2d 581). The Family Court was in the best position to assess the complainant's credibility, as it saw and heard her testimony first-hand (see, Matter of Tyrell A., 249 A.D.2d 467).
RITTER, J.P., JOY, GOLDSTEIN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.