AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THOMAS J. KEEFE, JR., RESPONDENT, v. E D SPECIALTY STANDS, INC., APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

Memorandum:

Plaintiff suffered a laceration to his ulnar nerve while performing iron work on bleachers and, despite three surgeries, has a permanent loss of feeling in his right hand, which is his dominant hand, and a permanent 50% loss of strength in that hand. Mter a jury trial on damages, plaintiff was awarded $1,000,000 for future pain and suffering to cover a 40-year period. We reject defendant's contention that the award deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation ( see, CPLR 5501[c]; McKeon v. Sears, Roebuck Co., 262 A.D.2d 7, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 818; see also, Van Deusen v. Norton Co., 204 A.D.2d 867, 870-871). We further reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in admitting evidence regarding the wage rates and fringe benefits of union ironworkers. Although plaintiff had not begun his apprenticeship at the time of the accident, he had completed all written and physical tests and had been notified that he would be accepted into the apprenticeship program. Thus, the loss of earnings was established with reasonable certainty ( see, Cranston v. Oxford Resources Corp., 173 A.D.2d 757, 758, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 860; see generally, Johnston v. Colvin, 145 A.D.2d 846, 848-849; cf., Naveja v. Hillcrest Gen. Hosp., 148 A.D.2d 429, 430).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KEEFE v. E D SPECIALTY STANDS
(May 10, 2000)