AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MURIEL DEMBER, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. WINTHROP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, RESPONDENT.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Muriel Dember (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) alleges that she slipped and fell on the tile floor in the lobby of the Winthrop University Hospital (hereinafter the defendant). She claims that she slipped on water tracked in by people entering the lobby during a heavy snowstorm, and that the defendant had constructive notice of this condition.

It is well settled that in order to establish constructive notice, the plaintiff must establish that the dangerous condition was visible and apparent and had existed for a sufficient time before the accident to permit the defendant's employees to discover and remedy it (see, Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836). Further, the general awareness that a dangerous condition may be present is legally insufficient to constitute notice of a particular condition (see, Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp., 84 N.Y.2d 967; McDuffie v. Fleet Fin. Group, Inc., ___ A.D.2d ___ [2d Dept., Feb. 28, 2000]). Here, after the defendant made out a prima facie case for summary judgment, the injured plaintiff's assertion that the defendant had a general awareness that water could accumulate on the lobby floor during a heavy snow was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see, McDuffie v. Fleet Fin. Group, Inc., supra). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment.

JOY, J.P., FLORIO, H. MILLER and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DEMBER v. WINTHROP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
(May 15, 2000)