In this observation sale case, evidence that defendant was in possession of $24 at the time of his arrest was relevant to corroborate the officer's testimony that he observed the defendant receive money from the purchaser shortly before defendant's arrest (People v. Sanchez, 181 A.D.2d 499, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 1054), and could not have suggested large-scale drug dealing or otherwise caused any prejudice. We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.