Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

ROBERT YUDASHKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID LINZMEYER, Defendant, and CRAIG HOLDEN and MASTER HOME INSPECTOR, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the September 28, 1999 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the order of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this matter to it for plenary consideration. On remand, the Court of Appeals shall consider the effect of MCR 2.604(A) and MCR 2.116(I)(5) on defendants' argument that plaintiff's amended complaint does not relate back to the date of the original complaint under MCR 2.118(D).

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

YUDASHKIN v. LINZMEYER
(May 16, 2000)