AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

HEDWIG KLEIN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. KING KULLEN GROCERY CO., INC., RESPONDENT.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint based upon lack of notice, the defendant is required to make a prima facie showing establishing the absence of notice as a matter of law ( see, Goldman v. Waldbaum, Inc., 248 A.D.2d 436, 437; Colt v. Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co., 209 A.D.2d 294, 295). In the instant case, the defendant met that burden. The expert affidavit offered in opposition to the motion for summary judgment was based on conclusory findings and was therefore insufficient to defeat it ( see, Solow v. Liebman, 262 A.D.2d 633).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KLEIN V. KING KULLEN GROCERY CO
(May 30, 2000)