AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. STATE OF NEW YORK, et. al., Plaintiffs,

SCHEDULING ORDER NO. 9

THOMAS PENFIELD JACKSON, District Judge.

In accordance with the proceedings of the telephonic conference call of June 1, 2000, it is, this 1st day of June, 2000,

ORDERED, that the plaintiffs shall file their response to Microsoft's specific comments as to the form of their revised proposed final judgment by the morning of June 5, 2000; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that defendant Microsoft shall have the opportunity to file a response to plaintiffs' reply, if it so chooses, by the morning of June 7, 2000; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that all filings aforesaid shall be on the public record.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
(Jun 1, 2000)