Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

78/79 YORK ASSOCIATES, Appellant, v. ROLAND RAND, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Order dated January 28, 1998 affirmed, with $10 costs.

Tenant's rent overcharge counterclaim, interposed in October 1995, is not barred under amended CPLR 213-a or amended Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 (Administrative Code of City of NY) § 26-516 (a). Those statutes preclude examination of the rental history of the housing accommodation prior to the four-year period immediately preceding the filing of a complaint or commencement of an action. The instant counterclaim does not seek inquiry into the legality of rent increases prior to the four-year period since it is challenging the amount of rent ($750) set forth in landlord's July 1992 registration statement ( cf., Zafra v. Pilkes, 245 A.D.2d 218; Theoharidou v. Newgarden, 176 Misc.2d 97). The rent registration statement in effect four years prior to the interposition of tenant's claim set forth a legal rent of $267.45. Accordingly, tenant is entitled to recover any overcharges paid within four years of its October 1995 claim.

FREEDMAN, J. P., and DAVIS, J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

78/79 YORK ASSOCS. v. RAND
(Apr 19, 1999)