AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS CAPACE, APPELLANT. (IND. NO. 197/96).

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The court properly admitted evidence of the defendant's uncharged crimes since they were relevant on the issue of motive (see, People v. Lewis, 69 N.Y.2d 321, 325), necessary to complete the narrative (see, People v. Gines, 36 N.Y.2d 932; People v. Bowden, 157 A.D.2d 789, 790), and were inextricably intertwined with the crime charged (see, People v. Vails, 43 N.Y.2d 364, 368-369).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CAPACE
(Jun 12, 2000)