AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE APPLICATION OF PEOLA LAYNE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, FOR A JUDGMENT, ETC., v. THE NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Medical Board's finding that petitioner is not disabled is supported by credible evidence, including its own examination of petitioner as well as an examination performed by an outside physician (see, Matter of DeNaro v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 265 A.D.2d 215, 696 N.Y.S.2d 152, citing, inter alia,Matter of Borenstein v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 88 N.Y.2d 756, 760).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE LAYNE v. NEW YORK CITY EMPL. RET. SYS
(Jun 8, 2000)