DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The petitioners' motion before the Supreme Court to strike certain affidavits submitted on behalf of the respondent Board of Zoning Appeals of the Village of East Hampton was properly denied. Judicial review of an administrative determination is limited to the record before the agency, and proof outside the administrative record should not be considered (see, Matter of Van Antwerp v. Board of Educ., 247 A.D.2d 676, 678; Matter of Fanelli v. New York City Conciliation Appeals Bd., 90 A.D.2d 756, affd 58 N.Y.2d 952). Here, the subject affidavits contained no new factual assertions. Moreover, one of the affidavits merely informed the Supreme Court that, based on revisions made by the respondent Travertine Corporation in its plans, several of the claims made by the petitioners had been rendered academic. It was proper to inform the court that subsequent events had rendered academic some of the claims contained in a petition before it. The facts established before the Zoning Board of Appeals and contained in the record were sufficient to sustain the challenged determination (see, Matter of Levine v. New York State Liq. Auth., 23 N.Y.2d 863).
The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.