Defendant's claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to join in his purported pro se motion to withdraw his plea cannot be reviewed on this appeal since it is based on facts dehors the record. The existing record does not establish the grounds of the motion, or even that there was such a motion pending before the court at the time of sentencing. Based on the record before us, we find that the defendant was provided with meaningful representation (see, People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714).
Defendant was not entitled to a hearing on his conclusory, unsupported assertions with respect to the plea agreement.
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.