AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MURRAY STARK, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY CO., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

After full consideration of plaintiffs' contentions in opposition to defendant's motion to confirm the referee's report, the report was properly confirmed since it was amply supported by the record (see, Muhlstock v. Cole, 245 A.D.2d 55, 58), and, in light of the clear proof of plaintiffs' willful noncompliance with their discovery obligations, the dismissal of their complaint was a proper exercise of the motion court's discretion (see, e.g., Ciao Europa, Inc. v. Silver Autumn Hotel Corp. Ltd., 270 A.D.2d 2, 704 N.Y.S.2d 809).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STARK v. RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY CO
(Jun 22, 2000)