DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly required the appellant to pay for her use and occupancy of real property owned by the plaintiff (see, Real Property Law § 220; cf., Trump CPS LLP v. Meyer, 249 A.D.2d 22; Tobias Corp. v. Jones, 236 A.D.2d 602; F.N.S. Atl. Co. v. City of New York, 201 A.D.2d 366).
The appellant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.