AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. GAVIN JOHNSON, APPELLANT. (IND. NO. 4768/95).

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court's charge conveyed the correct principles of law to the jury (see, People v. Ladd, 89 N.Y.2d 893; People v. Fields, 87 N.Y.2d 821).

The defendant's sentence is not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. JOHNSON
(Jul 3, 2000)