DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to vacate an order and judgment on the ground of newly-discovered evidence (see, CPLR 5015[a][2]), as the alleged newly-discovered evidence could have been discovered before the entry of the judgment (see, Dan's Supreme Supermarkets v. Redmont Realty Co., 261 A.D.2d 353).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.