AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JACQUES MATAS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ALPARGATAS S.A.I.C., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

CPLR 3213 provides an accelerated procedure for commencement and pursuit of an action where a right to payment can be ascertained from the face of a document, without regard to extrinsic evidence. To establish a prima facie case, plaintiff must present an "instrument for the payment of money only" and evidence of a failure to make the payment called for by its terms (Interman Indus. Products Ltd. v. R.S.M. Electron Power, 37 N.Y.2d 151, 155 [action did not qualify for accelerated treatment absent written instrument by which defendant was obligated to make payment]).

Through Merrill Lynch, plaintiffs purchased "custodial receipts" representing a beneficial interest of $1,440,000 in a portion of the 9.00% convertible bonds of defendant Alpargatas S.A.I.C. However, the certificates of ownership of these "custodial receipts" were not subscribed by Alpargatas S.A.I.C., and thus did not evince that plaintiffs were registered holders of any of the securities issued by defendant. Prior to instituting this suit, plaintiffs sought to obtain definitive securities representing their interests by exchanging their custodial receipts for the actual bond certificates, which they admit that they never received from defendant. It cannot be ascertained from the face of these documents, without regard to extrinsic evidence, that plaintiffs have a right to repayment and, accordingly, they do not possess an "instrument for the payment of money only". Thus, this action is not eligible for CPLR 3213 treatment.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATAS v. ALPARGATAS S.A.I.C
(Jul 13, 2000)