AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

RYAN CHERRY, APPELLANT, v. HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY, RESPONDENT.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured during lacrosse practice when he ran into a bench which was located on the side of the defendant's playing field. The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The bench was an open and obvious condition which could "readily be observed by those employing the reasonable use of their senses" (Paulo v. Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co., 233 A.D.2d 380). In opposition to the defendant's establishment of a prima facie case, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHERRY v. HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY
(Jul 17, 2000)